Since I have discussed competitive advantage in many other classes of mine I was not confused by the reading. However, I did think that simplifying what shapes competitive advantage into only 5 forces was not right.
I would ask the author if he believes those are only forces that shape competitive advantage or if there are more and he just believes these are the most important. I would also ask him which of the five points is the most important, in the sense that without that one point the entire idea would fail?
Like I said, I think that simplifying the forces into only 5 sections was wrong. This is because I feel like competitive advantage is flowing and constantly changing so it is tough to get a true read on what is more important at any point of time.
No comments:
Post a Comment